After decades of the industry’s dominance, the petroleum industry is beginning to see the light.
On Sunday, the US government is set to release its final report on how the gasoline industry has been doing in terms of protecting consumers, protecting the environment and reducing the cost of energy.
In addition to the report, which is expected to be released on Tuesday, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) released its final study on the topic, which focuses on a new kind of gasoline called “geometric-fractionated” gasoline, or GFF.GFF is the new kind, or “geometrical” gasoline that is used in vehicles that are intended to be driven in tight quarters and where the engine is being cooled or heated.
According to the NAS, the formula for GFF, which has been in use since 1997, is: Gasoline: Fractionated Formula: (Hydrogen) + (Oxidizer) + (Electrolyte) + Hydrogen gas + Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) + Carbon monoxide (O 2 ) and anhydrous ammonia.
The fuel, which the NAS says “has proven to be safe for gasoline vehicles in a variety of driving conditions,” has been proven to reduce CO 2 emissions by approximately 25 percent compared to traditional gasoline, while reducing emissions by more than 70 percent compared with diesel.
The NAS study, published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, found that “GFF can be used to reduce the CO 2 emission intensity of diesel and natural gas vehicles while reducing CO 2 intensity of gasoline vehicles.”
The new fuel is currently being tested on an EPA-certified vehicle.
“The fuel is being evaluated for the following emissions scenarios, which are all achievable with current technology and can be achieved with GFF,” the NAS said in a statement.
“The results of this testing will help the agency to determine whether the new fuel can be safely used on any of the vehicles tested in the United States.
The NAS, which did not provide a cost estimate, said that GFF would be more than 100 times more energy-efficient than diesel. “
This paradigm will require an evolution of the petroleum refining process, which will require a significant amount of innovation in the gasoline distribution and distribution system.”
The NAS, which did not provide a cost estimate, said that GFF would be more than 100 times more energy-efficient than diesel.
However, the NAS does not estimate the costs of the new gasoline fuel.
It did note, however, that the fuel has a high level of purity and safety, which it said is a major benefit.
As part of its report, the EPA released a study that said the fuel “does not require the use of the gas infrastructure of diesel or natural gas, and thus does not contribute to GHG emissions.””GFS is a proven, environmentally-sustainable alternative fuel to replace gasoline,” the EPA said in its statement.
There are other factors that are considered in determining the cost savings associated with GFS, including “fuel quality and purity,” “safety and environmental performance,” “efficiency in operating conditions and driving conditions.”
However, according to the EPA, “the study did not include the cost benefit analysis for this alternative fuel.”